Talk:Fun with Familiars
From The Heretic Knowledge Vault
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Erm... as a seemingly unimportant for conversation but actually important for legal reasons correction, Jim is not technically a member of Caffeine Angel Studios, nor is he an employee or legally authorized representative in any capacity except on the forums, where his representative powers are necessarily limited (by a verbal contract, but still limited). If he were a member of the company, he'd be liable for the studio's income on his taxes even if he never took a dime from us, and if he were an employee we'd have to pay taxes on him, so much as we love him, really the "not a member" thing is best all the way around. --[[User:Imp-Chan|Impy]] 12:22, 29 March 2008 (CST) | Erm... as a seemingly unimportant for conversation but actually important for legal reasons correction, Jim is not technically a member of Caffeine Angel Studios, nor is he an employee or legally authorized representative in any capacity except on the forums, where his representative powers are necessarily limited (by a verbal contract, but still limited). If he were a member of the company, he'd be liable for the studio's income on his taxes even if he never took a dime from us, and if he were an employee we'd have to pay taxes on him, so much as we love him, really the "not a member" thing is best all the way around. --[[User:Imp-Chan|Impy]] 12:22, 29 March 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | :OK, so the language now reflects what's on the main site: "member of the Errant Story team," not of Caffeine Angel. -- [[User:Graybeard|Graybeard]] 14:13, 29 March 2008 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:13, 29 March 2008
Erm... as a seemingly unimportant for conversation but actually important for legal reasons correction, Jim is not technically a member of Caffeine Angel Studios, nor is he an employee or legally authorized representative in any capacity except on the forums, where his representative powers are necessarily limited (by a verbal contract, but still limited). If he were a member of the company, he'd be liable for the studio's income on his taxes even if he never took a dime from us, and if he were an employee we'd have to pay taxes on him, so much as we love him, really the "not a member" thing is best all the way around. --Impy 12:22, 29 March 2008 (CST)
- OK, so the language now reflects what's on the main site: "member of the Errant Story team," not of Caffeine Angel. -- Graybeard 14:13, 29 March 2008 (CST)
